Skip to main content
nasen logo [green text that reads 'nasen' above grey text that reads 'helping everyone achieve']

nasen’s SLCN survey – what did you tell us?

Earlier this term, we published a survey asking nasen members to tell us more about provision for Speech, Language and Communication Needs in schools. Both the data and our professional conversations tell us that SLCN is a huge area of concern post-pandemic, even more so than previously, particularly in the Early Years and Key Stage 1. nasen wants to understand more about the current picture for provision and this survey was one of the initial steps in helping us to understand the current situation in practice.

Thank you very much to the 169 people who took the time to complete the survey – this is some of what we found:

  • A significant proportion of schools and settings do not have specialist provision in place to meet Speech, Language and Communication Needs:
Pie chart shows the breakdown of responses to the question 'What specialist provision is already in place within your school for pupils with speech language and communication needs?'. The response 'None skip to Q3' is the most popular. Next popular were 'qualified speech and language therapist', 'specialist interention' and 'traded services for pupils with SLCN'. Followed by 'speech and language therapy assistant' and 'specialist non-teacher'. The least popular response was 'specialist teacher'

 

  •  Where this provision does exist, supervision for it is almost always externally provided:
A pie chart showing responses to the survey question 'If you have speech and language therapy provision in your setting, please can you describe the level of clinical supervision they receive?'. The most popular response by a significant margin is 'external provided'. The next largest is 'externally provided (private) supervision' followed closely by 'none'. The least popular response is 'in house qualified supervision'.

 

  •  Most schools and settings have run targeted interventions run by non-specialist staff or have no additional dedicated capacity for interventions:
The pie chart shows the responses to the question 'What additional staff capacity do you have with your setting to support learners with SLCN?'. The most popular response, which makes up over half of all responses, was 'targeted interventions led by non-specialist staff'. The next popular response was 'no addiitonal dedicated capacity' and the least popular response was 'targeted interventions led by specialist staff'.

 

  •  39% of all schools and settings do not use a traded service to support pupils with SLCN, with the majority of those who do using NHS services:
Pie chart shows survey responses to the question 'Do you use a traded service to support pupils with SLCN?' Almost half of all responses said 'yes - NHS', around one third of responses said 'no' and the least popular response was 'yes - private service'.

Most schools and settings are providing professional development opportunities to their staff and there is an even split between those schools or settings where some staff have additional training or qualifications and those who do not.

These findings indicate how important this area is to schools and settings, as evidenced by the large number who have invested in training and staff time to support learners with SLCN. They also highlight some of the challenges around access to external support, and the lack of specialist staff to deliver support and intervention. nasen hopes to find new routes to support schools with SLC needs in 2023 and beyond.